What
would the world be like if we all said our exact thoughts? “Please, ma’am, missis is at home, but she
says as how you are so unpleasant to her she can’t abear to see you, and you do
so run on about yourself, and you have such a bonnet as give her the Jaundice
to look at” (pg. 329). I should think
there would be no peace, no love, and no happiness left among us if we ought
not, in some circumstance, tell a white lie (pg. 329).
As an example, I
present the common expression, “not at home”.
This was one phrase about which we used to have terrific
skirmishes. “Not at home” can mean “I am
not in the house; I am absent and abroad” or “I am not visible to friends to-day,
and it is no business of yours whether I am in the house or not” (pg.
329). Sometimes, voicing the truth is a
bit coarse and of “uncharitable selfishness” (pg. 330).
In
another example, Jane finds herself engaged in a pleasant group discussion
about Lily, a person she utterly dislikes.
If Jane submits to silence during the conversation rather than
interjecting her thoughts about Lily as a “priggish, solemn, unendurable owl”,
the result is that Jane “buries [her] owl deep in the ivy bush of formal
civilities” (pg. 331). Further, Jane,
keeping her tongue, finds that Lily is something better and brighter than an
owl. “Can any person in his clear moral
senses hesitate as to which is the greater evil”—white lying or bitter
uncharitable hate (pg. 331)? I should
think the purely innocent, or conventional, white lies are “allowable by the
canons of Christian morality” (pg. 329).
- Mckenzie Frey
Source: All the Year Round, Volume XIII,
pg. 329-331
Excerpt 3: Gambling
No comments:
Post a Comment